Here is an older (March 2008) but still good article titled “Acoustic Design for Green Buildings” that describes the challenges of green acoustics pretty well – from the viewpoint of the main acoustics ‘guru’ at Armstrong – Ken Roy. The article can be found here. I have placed some useful text excerpts here to give you the gist:
More green building design objectives need to include provisions for good acoustic performance…To attain [LEED] certification, the buildings must demonstrate they are environmentally responsible, profitable and healthy places to live and work. Included in these criteria is the expectation that the interior environment will foster the productivity of its occupants. In many cases, however, acoustic performance is overlooked in the design of these facilities. And, since acoustics are currently not specifically addressed in most green rating systems, the question arises: “How well are green buildings functioning in regard to acoustic performance or reduced noise distraction and annoyance?”….. University of California at Berkeley’s Center for the Built Environment (CBE)…has administered post-occupancy surveys..about indoor environmental quality…. 10 percent of the buildings were either LEED certified or “self-nominated” green buildings. …LEED buildings were found to be…slightly lower performing on acoustics, possibly because LEED did not directly address this issue until recently….Moreover, in all buildings surveyed, the level of acoustic satisfaction was the lowest performance factor of all the interior environmental factors surveyed. …
Ken goes on to discuss acoustical issues with exposed structures, underfloor air delivery (UFAD) systems, and the need for acoustics credits. LEED is making efforts to add acoustics, such as in LEED for schools and LEED for Healthcare, but awareness is still an issue.